H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Judith Wiesner vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-1

Judith Wiesner and Donna Faber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on clay, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1992 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Donna Faber
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #18 6-4 6-3 Donna Faber #83 Match data Mar 15, 1992* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Donna Faber #175 6-3 4-6 6-3 Judith Wiesner #34 Match data Apr 14, 1988* R32 Amelia Island Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Wiesner Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Judith Wiesner Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7% — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Judith Wiesner Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90
19 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13 — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.