H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-1
Judith Wiesner and Donna Faber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on clay, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1992 Key Biscayne second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-4 6-3 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1988* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Donna Faber | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |