H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 2-0
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1997 Auckland third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1997* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-1 6-3 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| May 22, 1993* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 7-5 6-4 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Judith Wiesner | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |