H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Katarzyna Nowak H2H: 1-1
Judith Wiesner and Katarzyna Nowak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarzyna Nowak leads 1–0 on clay, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katarzyna Nowak won the 1995 Amelia Island third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 57
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1995* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Katarzyna Nowak | 7-6 6-4 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Judith Wiesner | 6-0 6-1 | Katarzyna Nowak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Katarzyna Nowak | #855 | #47 | 162 | 1,660 | 26 | 50 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Katarzyna Nowak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #285 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #59 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #137 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |