H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Laura Garrone H2H: 0-2
Laura Garrone holds a 2–0 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Garrone leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1988 Hamburg second round 6-2 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1988* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Laura Garrone | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1988* | Nice | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Garrone | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |