H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1990 Key Biscayne second round 7-6 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1990* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 7-6 0-6 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Judith Wiesner | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |