H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Judith Wiesner vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-6

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 6–1 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1995 US Open first round 4-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #13 4-6 6-4 6-3 Judith Wiesner #26 Match data
May 14, 1993* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-2 7-6 Judith Wiesner #24 Match data
May 15, 1992* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 6-4 Judith Wiesner #23 Match data
Jul 3, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-0 7-5 Judith Wiesner #21 Match data
Sep 4, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-3 6-2 Judith Wiesner #15 Match data
May 18, 1990* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Judith Wiesner #16 0-1 (ret.) Mary Joe Fernandez #8 Match data
Mar 9, 1990* Boca Raton WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-4 6-1 Judith Wiesner #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,979 302 177 63.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Wiesner Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,696 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,751 0 1 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,736 0 2 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1992 29–17 63.0% #25 1,916 0 3 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,906 0 3 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,893 0 4 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,914 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 35–22 61.4% #15 1,925 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,829 0 5 — — — — — — —