H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 2-0
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1993 US Open first round 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 57
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| May 31, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 6-3 6-1 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |