H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Judith Wiesner vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 1-3

Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 3–1 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1994 Key Biscayne third round 6-4 4-6 6-0.

AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 1994* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #28 6-4 4-6 6-0 Judith Wiesner #21 Match data
May 23, 1993* Strasbourg WTA 500 F Clay Naoko Sawamatsu #23 4-6 6-1 6-3 Judith Wiesner #25 Match data
Jun 28, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Naoko Sawamatsu #35 6-1 7-5 Judith Wiesner #17 Match data
May 24, 1992* Strasbourg WTA 500 F Clay Judith Wiesner #22 6-1 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,979 302 177 63.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Wiesner Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,696 0 0 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,751 0 1 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,736 0 2 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
26 1992 29–17 63.0% #25 1,916 0 3
27 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,906 0 3
28 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,893 0 4
29 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,914 0 5
30 1996 35–22 61.4% #15 1,925 0 5
31 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,829 0 5