H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Judith Wiesner vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 1-3

Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 3–1 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1994 Key Biscayne round of 32 6-4 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Naoko Sawamatsu
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naoko Sawamatsu #28 6-4 4-6 6-0 Judith Wiesner #21 Match data Mar 14, 1994* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naoko Sawamatsu #23 4-6 6-1 6-3 Judith Wiesner #25 Match data May 23, 1993* F Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Naoko Sawamatsu #35 6-1 7-5 Judith Wiesner #17 Match data Jun 28, 1992* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Judith Wiesner #22 6-1 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #34 Match data May 24, 1992* F Strasbourg Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,970 183 129 58.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Wiesner Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1992 23–13 63.9% #24 1,856 0 1
20 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,853 0 2
21 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,870 0 3
22 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,847 0 3
23 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2 1996 19–17 52.8% #38 1,811 0 3
24 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,849 0 4
25 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,721 0 4
26 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Judith Wiesner Naoko Sawamatsu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 12 8 20 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 15 7 22 68.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 14 8 22 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 11 11 22 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 20 12 32 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7% — 117 77 194 60.3% 36 27 63 57.1% 20 16 36 55.6% 10 9 19 52.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Judith Wiesner Naoko Sawamatsu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1477 96.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1669 124.7 — — — — +57 — — 62.5% +0.77 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 110.2 +1.75
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1724 133.2 — — — — -8 -44 -170 55.4% +0.49 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +2.14
19 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09 1992 1857 143.8 — — — — -17 -155 -248 60.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -0.25
20 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77 1993 1853 139.0 — — — — -68 -33 -152 62.1% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 2–0 — +0.17
21 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26 1994 1871 146.2 — — — — -20 -58 -130 60.7% +1.00 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.5 -0.99
22 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01 1995 1848 150.6 — — — — +59 -74 -92 58.6% +0.48 10–7 (59%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 +1.09
23 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28 1996 1812 145.0 — — — — +5 +4 -6 53.2% +0.02 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 97.8 -0.27
24 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74 1997 1850 153.6 — — — — +44 -92 -62 54.0% +0.35 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 103.9 -1.59
25 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10 1998 1721 125.2 — — — — +37 -25 +64 40.5% -0.62 8–6 (57%) 1–1 — -0.88
26 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13 — 1971 148.7 — — — — +11 -58 -103 56.1% +0.40 67–48 (58%) 31–18 (63%) 109.3 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.