H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Judith Wiesner vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 2-0

Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1992 Boca Raton round of 32 3-6 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Natalia Medvedeva
UKR Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #17 3-6 6-4 7-6 Natalia Medvedeva #42 Match data Mar 5, 1992* R32 Boca Raton Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Judith Wiesner #17 6-0 7-5 Natalia Medvedeva #56 Match data Jan 4, 1991* R16 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Natalia Medvedeva #387 #23 295 1,882 111 111 50.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Wiesner Natalia Medvedeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #197 1,499 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 0–3 0.0% #317 1,473 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 10–9 52.6% #67 1,613 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #56 1,699 0 1
19 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1991 9–10 47.4% #83 1,700 0 1
20 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0 1992 20–16 55.6% #41 1,712 0 2
21 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0 1993 24–13 64.9% #23 1,871 0 4
22 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1 1994 17–21 44.7% #57 1,771 0 4
23 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2 1995 9–12 42.9% #79 1,694 0 4
24 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2 1996 6–8 42.9% #88 1,691 0 4
25 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2 1997 1–2 33.3% #388 1,669 0 4
26 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Judith Wiesner Natalia Medvedeva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 8 19 57.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
21 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7% — 75 63 138 54.3% 15 23 38 39.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 13 12 25 52.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Judith Wiesner Natalia Medvedeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1499 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.28
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1613 134.5 — — — — +25 -50 — 53.7% +0.44 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 -0.13
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1699 117.8 — — — — +9 -144 -151 50.7% -0.39 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 +0.78
19 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09 1991 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — — 50.0% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.02
20 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77 1992 1713 141.0 — — — — +46 -149 -169 55.3% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 96.0 -0.20
21 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26 1993 1871 140.9 — — — — +13 -238 -251 57.3% +0.49 12–3 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 112.5 +1.62
22 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01 1994 1771 141.0 — — — — +49 -194 — 47.7% +0.03 6–8 (43%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.33
23 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28 1995 1695 122.1 — — — — +28 -71 — 42.9% -0.67 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -1.63
24 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74 1996 1692 115.6 — — — — +46 -114 -98 40.7% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.11
25 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10 1997 1670 103.1 — — — — +44 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.18
26 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13 — 1882 138.9 — — — — +29 -146 -165 49.9% +0.01 39–32 (55%) 19–27 (41%) 101.4 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.