H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1
Judith Wiesner and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1995 Hobart fourth round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1995* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-0 6-2 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-2 6-2 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |