H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Kamstra in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Rosmalen round of 16 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | 6-3 6-4 | Petra Kamstra | Match data | Jun 21, 1996* | R16 | Rosmalen | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Judith Wiesner | 7-5 6-1 | Petra Kamstra | Match data | May 25, 1994* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,976 | 303 | 179 | 62.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Petra Kamstra | #425 | #70 | 90 | 1,585 | 21 | 36 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Petra Kamstra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #76 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Petra Kamstra | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1995 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 106 | 64 | 170 | 62.4% | 131 | 72 | 203 | 64.5% | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 41 | 30 | 71 | 57.7% | — | 12 | 21 | 33 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Petra Kamstra | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1486 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.38 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.26 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1482 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 11.1% | -2.89 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.35 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 | 1993 | 1479 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1514 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +64 | — | 53.3% | +0.60 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.77 | 1994 | 1477 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 35.5% | -1.10 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1696 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -111 | +11 | -79 | 57.1% | +0.56 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.5 | +2.26 | 1995 | 1577 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | -50 | — | +68 | 55.6% | +0.70 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.4 | +0.11 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1754 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -139 | +74 | — | 53.7% | +0.41 | 10–7 (59%) | 4–1 (80%) | 106.3 | -0.01 | 1996 | 1567 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -43 | +134 | 44.0% | -0.48 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +0.39 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1736 | 132.1 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +91 | -114 | 61.0% | +0.74 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 100.4 | +3.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 1846 | 152.4 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +17 | -141 | 64.7% | +1.10 | 9–6 (60%) | 10–5 (67%) | 105.5 | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 1963 | 155.9 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -50 | -187 | 61.1% | +0.73 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.4 | -2.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 1912 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +17 | -128 | 57.7% | +0.49 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.2 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 1906 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +50 | — | 60.4% | +0.67 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.1 | -1.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 1894 | 149.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +42 | — | 63.5% | +0.95 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.6 | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 1915 | 149.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -25 | -156 | 61.8% | +1.24 | 11–7 (61%) | 2–9 (18%) | 92.9 | -1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1923 | 154.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -98 | -7 | 59.8% | +0.61 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.5 | -2.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 1826 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -4 | +98 | 61.8% | +0.87 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 95.1 | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1976 | 153.6 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +18 | -79 | 60.2% | +0.76 | 84–63 (57%) | 50–36 (58%) | 106.1 | -0.13 | — | 1585 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -43 | +98 | 41.5% | -0.57 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.5 | +2.23 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jul 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 11 | 11 | Oct 5, 1996 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 9, 1997 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6 | 2 | 8 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 7 | 8 | Nov 18, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 21, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 13, 1996 | H2H |
| Laura Golarsa | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 2, 1995 | H2H |