H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judith Wiesner vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-0
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1987 Phoenix third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Wiesner | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |