H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Judy Congdon vs Alex Cowie H2H: 3-2
Judy Congdon holds a 3–2 lead over Alex Cowie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Judy Congdon leads 3–1 on clay, while Alex Cowie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alex Cowie won the 1970 Nottingham fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1970* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Alex Cowie | 6-2 6-3 | Judy Congdon | Match data |
| May 21, 1970* | Wolverhampton | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Cowie | 6-2 3-6 10-8 | Judy Congdon | Match data |
| May 22, 1969* | Chingford | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Judy Congdon | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | Alex Cowie | Match data |
| May 10, 1968* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Judy Congdon | 6-4 6-3 | Alex Cowie | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1968* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Judy Congdon | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | Alex Cowie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Congdon | — | — | — | 1,536 | 35 | 48 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Cowie | — | — | — | 1,611 | 36 | 59 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Congdon | Alex Cowie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–17 | 29.2% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1973 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1974 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |