H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 3-0
Judy Tegart holds a 3–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Judy Tegart leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1971 Venice fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 88
Right-Handed
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1971* | Venice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Judy Tegart | 6-2 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1971* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-2 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1968* | Curacao | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Judy Tegart | 6-3 6-0 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |