H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Judith Salome H2H: 2-0
Judy Tegart holds a 2–0 lead over Judith Salome in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judy Tegart leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1969 Curacao quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1969* | Curacao | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Judy Tegart | 6-3 6-4 | Judith Salome | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1968* | Australian Championships | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-1 6-1 | Judith Salome | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Judith Salome | — | — | — | 1,581 | 27 | 38 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Judith Salome | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |