H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Linda Tuero H2H: 2-1
Judy Tegart holds a 2–1 lead over Linda Tuero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on clay, while Judy Tegart leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1968 US Open fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1968* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 7-5 6-2 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| May 4, 1968* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 1-6 8-6 6-2 | Judy Tegart | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1968* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Judy Tegart | 6-3 6-4 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |