H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Marcie Louie H2H: 1-0
Judy Tegart holds a 1–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judy Tegart leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1972 San Francisco fourth round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1972* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Judy Tegart | 6-0 6-0 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |