H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 1-0
Judy Tegart holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judy Tegart leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1972 Oklahoma City fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 88
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1972* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Judy Tegart | 6-1 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |