H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-0
Judy Tegart holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1981 Winchester semifinal 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 88
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1981* | Winchester | WTA 250 | SF | — | Judy Tegart | 6-3 7-6 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |