H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Coin vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Julie Coin holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Coin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Coin won the 2010 Indian Wells first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Julie Coin | 6-4 6-3 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Coin | #770 | #60 | 1,039 | 1,577 | 12 | 35 | 25.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Coin | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #97 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #74 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #214 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #268 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |