H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 3-0
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1996 Indian Wells third round 6-1 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1994* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 6-3 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| May 12, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 7-6 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Angelica Gavaldon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |