H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Ann Grossman H2H: 2-1

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1995 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Halard-Decugis #20 6-4 3-6 6-2 Ann Grossman #50 Match data Jun 1, 1995* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ann Grossman #46 1-6 6-3 6-1 Julie Halard-Decugis #18 Match data Aug 13, 1994* SF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #18 3-6 6-4 6-4 Ann Grossman #94 Match data Nov 1, 1991* R16 Scottsdale Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.