H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 2–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1998 Indian Wells second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-0 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 13, 1995* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1994* | Essen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julie Halard-Decugis | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |