H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Claudine Toleafoa H2H: 2-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 2–1 lead over Claudine Toleafoa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1994 Auckland third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1994* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-0 6-0 | Claudine Toleafoa | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Claudine Toleafoa | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Claudine Toleafoa | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Claudine Toleafoa | #883 | #121 | 9 | 1,570 | 16 | 34 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Claudine Toleafoa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #126 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #883 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |