H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Dominique Monami H2H: 2-2
Julie Halard-Decugis and Dominique Monami are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Eastbourne final 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2000* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1999* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | QF | Carpet | Dominique Monami | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1999* | Auckland | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 6-1 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-2 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Dominique Monami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |