H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Elna Reinach H2H: 3-1

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1995 Canadian Open round of 64 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Halard-Decugis #31 7-6 6-2 Elna Reinach #76 Match data Aug 16, 1995* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Elna Reinach #61 6-3 6-7 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #29 Match data Oct 29, 1993* R16 Essen Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #27 6-3 3-6 6-4 Elna Reinach #62 Match data Aug 10, 1991* SF Albuquerque Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #29 1-6 6-4 6-4 Elna Reinach #50 Match data Jun 20, 1991* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,863 145 171 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Elna Reinach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,656 0 0
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,631 0 0
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,810 0 0
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3 1992 10–17 37.0% #109 1,654 0 0
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,706 0 1
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,730 0 1
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,665 0 1
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Elna Reinach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 9 5 14 64.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
18 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 13 6 19 68.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9% — 78 83 161 48.4% 19 37 56 33.9% 37 34 71 52.1% 11 17 28 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Elna Reinach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1496 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
16 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12 1985 1494 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
17 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31 1986 1656 129.6 — — — — +25 -92 -83 53.6% +0.25 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.54
18 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36 1987 1632 140.4 — — — — +3 -125 +10 39.7% -0.55 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 93.7 -3.04
19 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86 1988 1810 145.0 — — — — -44 -214 -80 60.0% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 105.9 -0.96
20 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15 1989 1775 141.0 — — — — -7 -178 -39 48.7% -0.08 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -1.40
21 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82 1990 1714 130.7 — — — — +25 -203 +61 44.4% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 -0.55
22 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92 1991 1705 139.8 — — — — -52 -76 +48 44.4% -0.41 6–10 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.3 -3.80
23 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05 1992 1654 132.3 — — — — +5 -67 +81 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -1.31
24 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60 1993 1706 131.0 — — — — +28 -124 +17 52.4% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 94.7 +0.42
25 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28 1994 1731 133.1 — — — — -3 — +12 43.1% -0.62 7–4 (64%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -1.92
26 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1995 1665 126.3 — — — — +1 -138 +127 39.3% -0.46 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -1.57
27 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35 — 1864 143.2 — — — — -4 -139 +16 46.6% -0.19 47–58 (45%) 23–30 (43%) 98.0 -4.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.