H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Fang Li H2H: 3-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–1 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-2 6-4 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1999* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-2 7-6 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1998* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1998* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Fang Li | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julie Halard-Decugis | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |