H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Fang Li H2H: 3-1

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–1 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 US Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Halard-Decugis #11 6-2 6-4 Fang Li #94 Match data Sep 2, 1999* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #20 6-2 7-6 Fang Li #42 Match data Mar 10, 1999* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #27 6-1 6-2 Fang Li #45 Match data Nov 22, 1998* F Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Fang Li #65 3-6 6-2 6-1 Julie Halard-Decugis Match data Jan 15, 1998* R16 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Fang Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0
21 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0
29 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Fang Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9% — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Fang Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
20 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54
21 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90
22 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34
23 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31
24 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54
25 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15
26 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13
27 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39
28 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00
29 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35 — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.