H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Florencia Labat H2H: 3-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–1 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 Auckland fourth round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1999* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-0 6-2 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1994* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 1-6 6-0 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1993* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-6 6-2 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| May 4, 1989* | Taranto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 6-4 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |