H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 1-2
Gigi Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gigi Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1995 US Open second round 7-6 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 7-6 3-6 6-4 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1994* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 5-7 7-6 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1991* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 6-0 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Gigi Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |