H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-2

Isabel Cueto holds a 2–1 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1990 Barcelona quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 28, 1990* Barcelona WTA 250 QF Clay Isabel Cueto #28 6-2 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #45 Match data
Oct 13, 1988* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Isabel Cueto #31 6-4 7-5 Julie Halard-Decugis #63 Match data
Oct 10, 1987* Athens WTA 250 SF Clay Julie Halard-Decugis #123 7-6 7-6 Isabel Cueto #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,521 0 0
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,539 0 0
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,760 0 0
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,826 0 2
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,817 0 4
21 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12