H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-2
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–1 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1996 Linz quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1996* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-5 6-3 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-0 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1992* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Judith Wiesner | 3-6 7-6 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |