H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1987 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |