H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 2-2
Julie Halard-Decugis and Kristie Boogert are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 7-6 0-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kristie Boogert | 7-6 0-6 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1998* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 6-2 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1995* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kristie Boogert | 5-7 7-6 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1993* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-2 6-3 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Kristie Boogert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |