H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 2-0
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1995 Prague fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1995* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-5 6-1 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-2 6-0 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julie Halard-Decugis | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |