H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-2
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–1 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Tokyo Nichirei fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1994* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-1 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1993* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-4 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julie Halard-Decugis | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |