H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 0-4

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1994 Paris final 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 1994* Paris WTA 500 F Hard Martina Navratilova #4 7-5 6-3 Julie Halard-Decugis #31 Match data
Feb 20, 1993* Paris WTA 500 QF Hard Martina Navratilova #4 6-0 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #20 Match data
Mar 2, 1991* Palm Springs WTA 250 QF Hard Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 7-5 Julie Halard-Decugis #49 Match data
Aug 31, 1989* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Martina Navratilova #2 6-1 6-0 Julie Halard-Decugis #168 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 — — — — — — — 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 — — — — — — — 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 — — — — — — — 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168