H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 3-3

Julie Halard-Decugis and Mary Joe Fernandez are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1998 Tokyo fourth round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #29 6-1 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #53 Match data
Aug 29, 1998* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #31 7-5 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #61 Match data
Jan 13, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 7-6 6-3 Julie Halard-Decugis #29 Match data
May 17, 1991* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Julie Halard-Decugis #36 6-0 5-7 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #5 Match data
Jan 21, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-0 3-6 6-0 Julie Halard-Decugis #112 Match data
Jun 15, 1988* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #16 6-0 4-6 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12 — — — — — — —