H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Julie Halard-Decugis vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 3-4

Natasha Zvereva holds a 4–3 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 Birmingham quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 6-2.

FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 1999* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Julie Halard-Decugis #18 4-6 6-4 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #17 Match data
May 13, 1999* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Julie Halard-Decugis #21 6-2 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #19 Match data
Sep 18, 1997* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #25 4-6 6-3 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #178 Match data
Nov 11, 1994* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Natasha Zvereva #10 6-1 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #22 Match data
May 31, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Julie Halard-Decugis #24 7-6(2) 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #9 Match data
Jan 11, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Natasha Zvereva #14 7-5 7-5 Julie Halard-Decugis #40 Match data
Jan 13, 1990* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Natasha Zvereva #18 4-6 6-2 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Halard-Decugis Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
31 2002 0–1 0.0% 1,733 0 5