H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-3
Nicole Bradtke holds a 3–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1995 Auckland quarterfinal 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1995* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 7-6 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1991* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicole Bradtke | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| May 3, 1990* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Bradtke | 6-4 7-6 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Nicole Bradtke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |