H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 2–1 lead over Regina Rajchrtova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on grass, while Regina Rajchrtova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1992 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 6-1 | Regina Rajchrtova | Match data | Jun 24, 1992* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Regina Rajchrtova | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data | Sep 22, 1989* | R16 | Paris | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-5 7-5 | Regina Rajchrtova | Match data | Jun 28, 1989* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,024 | 340 | 221 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Regina Rajchrtova | #340 | #26 | 32 | 1,797 | 63 | 66 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Regina Rajchrtova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #193 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #55 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #212 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,916 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #15 | 1,837 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Regina Rajchrtova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1987 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1987 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1991 | 26 | 13 | 39 | 66.7% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1988 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1989 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1993 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1990 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1994 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1991 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 24 | 1995 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1992 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 164 | 109 | 273 | 60.1% | 117 | 62 | 179 | 65.4% | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 28 | 33 | 61 | 45.9% | — | 24 | 25 | 49 | 49.0% | 34 | 30 | 64 | 53.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Regina Rajchrtova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1987 | 1643 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +21 | — | 58.8% | 0.00 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–1 (83%) | 107.7 | +1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 1612 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | -40 | +60 | -85 | 45.0% | -0.08 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–7 (22%) | 95.8 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1625 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -13 | — | 39.7% | -0.70 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1708 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -46 | +7 | -172 | 52.9% | +0.32 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.8 | -1.86 | 1987 | 1536 | 123.2 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +17 | — | 50.0% | +0.23 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.4 | -0.01 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1821 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | -31 | +28 | -239 | 59.2% | +0.73 | 18–5 (78%) | 5–1 (83%) | 112.4 | +1.15 | 1988 | 1544 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +28 | — | 40.0% | -0.47 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.02 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1819 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +139 | -169 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 8–2 (80%) | 3–5 (38%) | 104.1 | -1.82 | 1989 | 1704 | 133.6 | — | — | — | — | -113 | +62 | — | 55.4% | +0.01 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–1 (83%) | 109.0 | +0.55 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1819 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +29 | — | 59.2% | +0.48 | 6–6 (50%) | 9–2 (82%) | 105.4 | +1.92 | 1990 | 1693 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -181 | +122 | — | 46.5% | -0.30 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–4 (33%) | 102.0 | -0.02 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1890 | 153.5 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +106 | — | 60.0% | +0.46 | 14–8 (64%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | -0.05 | 1991 | 1737 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -29 | — | 52.3% | -0.20 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.1 | +0.07 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1771 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +220 | — | 55.1% | +0.33 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.1 | +0.60 | 1992 | 1614 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +22 | — | 29.0% | -1.52 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.5 | -0.47 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1856 | 152.1 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +132 | — | 69.0% | +1.29 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.2 | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 1843 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 1917 | 157.6 | — | — | — | — | -29 | +48 | -109 | 60.5% | +0.78 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–6 (57%) | 100.1 | -3.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 1930 | 160.9 | — | — | — | — | -32 | +91 | -17 | 63.8% | +0.88 | 14–5 (74%) | 8–4 (67%) | 110.3 | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 1837 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +79 | +214 | 52.5% | +0.20 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.6 | +1.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2024 | 152.3 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +76 | -46 | 57.5% | +0.49 | 110–64 (63%) | 67–50 (57%) | 111.7 | -0.35 | — | 1797 | 131.4 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +56 | — | 48.5% | -0.28 | 26–23 (53%) | 14–13 (52%) | 102.9 | +0.11 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 3 | 8 | 11 | Jan 10, 2000 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 2 | 8 | 10 | Mar 18, 2000 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 1 | 9 | 10 | May 15, 1999 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 3 | 5 | 8 | Nov 9, 2000 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 18, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel Cueto | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 13, 1992 | H2H |
| Sandra Cecchini | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 3, 1991 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 14, 1991 | H2H |