H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Sabine Hack H2H: 1-1
Julie Halard-Decugis and Sabine Hack are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on clay, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1993 Houston fourth round 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1993* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1991* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 6-4 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |