H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Halard-Decugis vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-1
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1996 Auckland quarterfinal 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1996* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Halard-Decugis | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |