H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julie Heldman vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 2-0
Julie Heldman holds a 2–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1973 Sao Paulo semifinal 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1973* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1968* | Caracas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julie Heldman | 6-3 6-0 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Heldman | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |