H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julie Heldman vs Isabel Fernandez De Soto H2H: 1-1
Julie Heldman and Isabel Fernandez De Soto are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Isabel Fernandez De Soto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1974 Edinburgh semifinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 75
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1974* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Julie Heldman | 6-4 6-2 | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1974* | Fort Lauderdale | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | 7-5 7-5 | Julie Heldman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
| Isabel Fernandez De Soto | — | — | — | 1,783 | 90 | 106 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Heldman | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 | 1974 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 | 1975 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 | 1976 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |