H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Julie Heldman vs Laurie Tenney H2H: 3-0
Julie Heldman holds a 3–0 lead over Laurie Tenney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1974 Roland Garros fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 70
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1974* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-2 6-2 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| May 24, 1974* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-1 6-1 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1973* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Julie Heldman | 6-1 6-4 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
| Laurie Tenney | — | — | — | 1,720 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Heldman | Laurie Tenney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 17–11 | 60.7% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |