H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julie Heldman vs Zenda Liess H2H: 1-0

Julie Heldman holds a 1–0 lead over Zenda Liess in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1974 Sarasota round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Heldman
USA Age 80 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Zenda Liess
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Heldman 6-3 6-2 Zenda Liess Match data Apr 11, 1974* R32 Sarasota WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Heldman — — — 2,133 381 159 70.6% 0 0 0 0 21 21
Zenda Liess — — — 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Heldman Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,619 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,742 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,662 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
22 1968 53–15 77.9% — 1,811 0 6 — — — — — — —
23 1969 74–17 81.3% — 2,020 0 14 — — — — — — —
24 1970 29–12 70.7% — 1,959 0 15 — — — — — — —
25 1971 41–23 64.1% — 2,031 0 16 — — — — — — —
26 1972 32–26 55.2% — 1,962 0 16 — — — — — — —
27 1973 68–31 68.7% — 2,074 0 19 — — — — — — —
28 1974 60–21 74.1% — 2,089 0 21 — — — — — — —
29 1975 24–14 63.2% — 1,995 0 21 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Heldman Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.30
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +28 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1619 124.4 — — — — -92 +63 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1743 135.7 — — — — -78 -37 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1662 120.1 — — — — -29 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1610 95.3 — — — — -77 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1968 1811 138.4 — — — — -128 +140 -203 73.8% +2.05 10–3 (77%) — — -1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1969 2021 153.7 — — — — +84 +69 -264 74.9% +2.13 16–5 (76%) — — -8.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1970 1960 152.1 — — — — — +143 -157 70.9% +1.83 3–5 (38%) — — -3.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1971 2032 159.2 — — — — +11 +32 -114 62.0% +1.18 10–8 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 97.7 -6.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1972 1963 153.4 — — — — +119 +20 -75 55.3% +0.34 7–9 (44%) 4–0 (100%) 98.9 -9.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1973 2075 159.9 — — — — -31 -45 +40 66.5% +1.41 12–9 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 -10.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1974 2090 159.9 — — — — -2 -3 +79 69.7% +1.48 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.8 -5.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1975 1995 149.5 — — — — +96 -22 — 59.0% +0.87 6–3 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 98.1 -3.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2134 158.8 — — — — +33 +56 -56 67.3% +1.47 75–48 (61%) 14–18 (44%) 100.6 -9.28 — 1744 131.4 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.