H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaoru Okamoto vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-1
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Kaoru Okamoto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1989 Eastbourne second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1989* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-0 6-1 | Kaoru Okamoto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Okamoto | #225 | #75 | 14 | 1,589 | 23 | 44 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kaoru Okamoto | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #151 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #208 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #115 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 |