H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaoru Okamoto vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-1
Kaoru Okamoto and Catarina Lindqvist Ryan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kaoru Okamoto leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaoru Okamoto won the 1991 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1991* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kaoru Okamoto | 7-5 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1987* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-4 | Kaoru Okamoto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Okamoto | #225 | #75 | 14 | 1,589 | 23 | 44 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kaoru Okamoto | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #151 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #208 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #115 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |