H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaoru Okamoto vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-0
Kaoru Okamoto holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kaoru Okamoto leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaoru Okamoto won the 1987 Singapore third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1987* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kaoru Okamoto | 6-1 6-2 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Okamoto | #225 | #75 | 14 | 1,589 | 23 | 44 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kaoru Okamoto | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #151 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #208 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #115 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |