H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaoru Okamoto vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-0
Kaoru Okamoto holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kaoru Okamoto leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaoru Okamoto won the 1989 Tokyo quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1989* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Kaoru Okamoto | 7-5 6-4 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Okamoto | #225 | #75 | 14 | 1,589 | 23 | 44 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kaoru Okamoto | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #151 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 1988 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #208 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #115 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |